katiewhocanread:
thiefree:
katiewhocanread:
booknerdconfessions:
a lot of the times, yeah. lool.
i would rather the artist had defaced their face with a black marker, than this book.
Maybe. Maybe it wasn’t a good book.
It’s still a book!
*sigh* ok. I’m going to explain my opinion on this, because I know you won’t jump down my throat for it!
My “books aren’t sacred” tag has a few posts in, and they all reflect my desire that books be taken off the pedestal they’ve been put on by some. They are considerably less expensive and difficult to produce than almost everything we use in daily life. In each case, the owner of the book has decided that they want to turn it into a piece of art rather than read it again. That’s their call to make; whether the resulting art is better than the book is entirely debatable (in this case, I feel that it was somewhat lazy).
Thing is, I know why people get so angry about it. Some of us so define ourselves by our love of good writing that this kind of pantomimed response is required, to further prove to the world that we are ‘book people’.
But an object is not the same as the story. The story is still out there, can still be bought and read and loved. It’s not years of a scribe’s life this person scrawled on; it’s a few £’s worth of paper and ink.